Maykop (deep bipolar origin clustering) : 無料・フリー素材/写真
Maykop (deep bipolar origin clustering) / George Cedrik
| ライセンス | クリエイティブ・コモンズ 表示-継承 2.1 |
|---|---|
| 説明 | Seem like the Oghuz "bull cult" is confirmed."Turks brought with them the image of the Bull and the Phallic saints as a symbol of male power and, as a consequence, the patriarchal clan system, as well as ancestor worship and funeral rite. (ALEKSEYEVA I.L. 1991: 20-21)." (www.v-stetsyuk.name/en/Alterling/Bulgar.html)Tajiks and Pamiris are always doomed to lower genetic ranks, even though they do not really differ from Turks by cultural and physiogonomic traits. Tajik nationalists generally tend to segregate themselves from East-Asian-admixed Turks of Central Asia, not seeing they are actually hardcore Oghuz-related themselves. What an irony. They even have the same bard traditions.Russian-backed Tajik nationalism explained in a nutshell:1. »Tajikistan declared its independence on 9th September 1991, soon after the break up of the former Soviet Union. Area wise and population wise it the smallest republic of the region. Being surrounded by the Turkic speaking population, ... there was a sense of fear that it would be overwhelmed by the Turks in the region. Soon the Republic embarked on the task of building its own national identity based on race, culture and language and severa] other components. ... Generally, the difficulty of establishing a Tajik identity is the principal obstacle to developing a strong sense of Tajik nationalism among Tajikistan's population. In many respects, this also explains the persistence of a strong regional loyalty that has bedeviled the nation-building process in post-Soviet Tajikistan. Unlike other Central Asians, the Tajiks have not been able to identify with a historically cohesive political entity. This has led to Tajikistan's marginalization in regional politics and its domination by its more cohesive and big neighbours, especially Uzbekistan and Kazakhstan. Another feature of the population of Tajikistan is that it contains a sizeable percentage of non-'Tajiks', largest among them being the Uzbeks but there are also Kyrgyz, Tatars and others.« (Zafar, Athar: "Language, culture and identity in Tajikistan" (shodhganga.inflibnet.ac.in/handle/10603/18349). Jawaharlal Nehru University, School of International Studies, 2009. Chapter 1, page 10 (shodhganga.inflibnet.ac.in/bitstream/10603/18349/7/07_cha...).)2. »Semenov and some Russian authors opposed the Aryans not to Semites but to Turks, thereby avoiding anti-Semitic overtones only to replace them with anti-Turkic ones. ... Krymskii viewed Islamic societies through a racist and dichotomous prism, which opposed allegedly creative and rational Aryans (and Semites) to supposedly dull and fanatic Turks (and Mongols).90 This Persophile and Turkophobe vision of Central Asian history informed the Tajik nationalist narrative of history that Semenov helped to devise during the 1920s, and which until today defines Tajik (Iranian/Aryan) national identity against an Uzbek (Turkic) “other.” ... It underlays both Bobrinskii’s promotion of imperial patronage over the Mountain Tajiks and Semenov’s advocacy of national self-determination for the Tajik “eastern brother of the European nations.” ... By juxtaposing the Tajiks as racially Aryan and Iranophone aborigines to invading Turks, they facilitated the conceptualization of the Tajiks as a distinct and autochthonous nation within the entangled sociocultural milieu of the Central Asian sedentary population. ... Over the first decades of the twentieth century, through the early Soviet period, the Tajik Aryan myth would transform from a narrative legitimizing Russian imperial rule to a myth of Tajik national identity. The article shows how Tajikistan’s imagining and formation as a nation-state was inextricably linked to the Aryan myth ... The political effect of Semenov’s portrayal of the Tajiks as the descendants of the Aryan aborigines of Central Asia and the victims of predominantly Turkic conquerors was the legitimization of both late imperial and early Soviet rule over territories that are part of present-day Tajikistan. ... the process of delimiting borders and identities in 1920s Central Asia was influenced not only by Moscow-based Bolsheviks and leading Central Asian Muslim political figures but also by Russian orientalists as distinctive historical actors.« (source: Matthias Battis: "The Aryan Myth and Tajikistan: From a Myth of Empire to One National Identity" (discovery.ucl.ac.uk/id/eprint/10036035/1/Battis_project_m...), Ab Imperio (muse.jhu.edu/article/650986), 4/2016, pp. 155-183 / DOI: doi.org/10.1353/imp.2016.0089)More at: web.archive.org/web/20220429200958/https://commons.wikime... web.archive.org/web/20220429004341/https://www.reddit.com...Note: The three Georgian men next to the door (middle) belong to the Nakh Batsi tribes who consider themselve as Tush (Tushetians)._________________________Turkmen horseman, Iran: drive.google.com/file/d/1uy9xjEzJy6D6O3h0ehIIrosNkJBDGytx... |
| 撮影日 | 2022-05-10 08:49:35 |
| 撮影者 | George Cedrik |
| 撮影地 |
.png){kind=link}